Size of the cavity

-

The Building Regulations 2000 (England and Wales) specifically prohibit retrofit cavity insulation in cavities less than 50mm.

The following design conditions have been taken from the BBA joint publication Cavity Insulation of Masonry Walls — Dampness Risks and How to Minimise Them.
The cavity width must be at least 50 mm

When the CIGA inpsector investigated a damp wall which was highlighted by an independent damp surveyor  as being saturated with wet cavity wall insulator he exclaimed that cavity was really narrow but none of this made it into the report.

CIGA tells us you cannot rely on a single measure of cavity width on a property.
In the CIGA"Technician’s guide to best practice Version 2.0 - Issued July 2002  Installing Cavity Wall insulation states"

At least ten cavity width measurements should be made at various places, throughout the building, to give an accurate calculation.

Measuring my cavity 

Using the wall affected by damp, I measured the corner brick to confirm an imperial 110mm depth brick.

Imperial brick on measured at 110mm depth



Chopstick inserted into the airvent until it hit a wall. Cavity Depth marked with sharp knife and  the same depth readings were recorded in all parts of the vent confirming that the tip of the chopstick was hitting a flat surface (i.e wall).

Subtracting the depth of the brick 110mm from the cavity reading....

Gives us a 40mm cavity.
So CWI in a wall with a 40mm cavity is clear violation to building regs , the system designer specification,BBA and CIGA's and guidelines.
The main risk being a much greater risk of water penetration across the cavity to the inner leaf which is exactly what has happened to this wall.
I know that other walls in the house have larger cavities but 1930s houses have considerable variability and the thick imperial brick makes it more likely that there will be narrow cavities.

I have left a message with Building control to see if they have a view on this.

Comments

  1. Anonymous14 September 2021 at 00:23

    CIGA's own report of my home states that the cavity is an average of 50mm and yet they claim all my concerns are not related to CWI.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The controversy over Cavity Wall Insulation 'topups'

-
Image
In this article I talk about the practice and problems of topping up insulation when voids are discovered, why it is being done and the potential violations of building regulations. I can only put forwards what I have understood from public documents and personal correspondence  So I welcome corrections or clarifications from the industry on this important issue for home owners and will happily update this post to reflect any inaccurate statements. We know that 100s of topups are done every year.   From what I can gather : If the BBA have not approved these topups then the relevant local authority building control should have been notified prior to topping up as an 'off licence' use of the product.  It is not clear that the correct procedures are being followed in all cases. Background :Voids are common A void is simply an area cavity between the walls which is missing insulation.  If a void is large enough then the insulation will not be compliant with the meter square
Read more

Lintels, weep holes and render

-
Image
I found the notion of lintels in cavity trays difficult to visualise. The reason I'm looking into lintels is that there is a damp patch that runs along the lintel over the front door. Brick houses built today will have cavity trays and weep holes inserted into the design. You will spot weep holes these as either gaps in the mortar or where the mortar is replaced with a perforated plastic insert as below. CIGA state that no water should enter the cavity is properly maintained building. If that is so then why does building control mandate a cavity tray. Typical modern cavity tray with weep holes sitting on a steel lintel. The purpose of a cavity tray is to ensure moisture that gets in the cavity when driven through the mortar joints or other means is directed back to the outside wall and out of the building. If you didn't have a cavity tray or some sort of damp proof course then moisture would collect on the flat lintel and then flow off the sides of the lintel or soa
Read more

Discrepancies between Internal and external DPC (damp proof course)

-
Image
In a cavity wall construction, one would expect that the damp proof membrane to be at the same level on both walls. It turns out this is not always the case and my house is a good example where the internal wall's DPC is more than a brick lower than the external wall DPC. I didn't even think to check this before reading the CIGA Technical note 14 . This clearly states that if the distance between DPC and ground level is within a brick (as was the case with my property at time of install) then 'numerous other factors' must be assessed before declaring the dwelling as being suitable for CWI. CIGA  Technical note 14 . One of the factors is the relative level of the inner and outer leaf DPC. This is exactly what I found in my property. Ive used a floorboard to show the position of the internal floor. The DPC is clearly a brick below the floorboard and less than brick above the block paving. External leaf DPC is 1 brick below the floor level.
Read more