Building control and cavity wall insulation

-
When CWI is put in, the installer must notify building control of the insulation. And that's about it.
When you sell your property the application date and presence of CWI will show up on building regulation searches initiated by the potential buyer's solicitor.

Building control have no record of the type of insulation and the search does not tell you which company installed it. If you do need to get CWI removed, then it's not clear how this would work. Should building control make a record of the removal?

In my area local authority building control is provided by Southern Building Control Partnership so I though I would ask them about what happens when it is removed. My main worry was that somehow that we would be forced to replace it with a different type of insulation.

I spoke to a chap who to be honest wasn't at all helpful.
He told me that building regulations inspectors would only have to be involved if 25% or more of the bricks in the external leaf would have to be removed. If there was any doubt then he told me to put an application in for review by building regs.
He asked me how I was intending to remove the CWI and I said that I'd approached some extraction companies but there was no best practice or 'industry standard' for extraction which makes it difficult. He told me that they don't get involved and that the whole industry is essentially unregulated.

I asked him if his department had ever been involved in extraction of cavity wall insulation and he said not in the 30 years he's been working there.
I informed him of my investigation into the cavity width being less than 50mm which is against building regs and he said that he didn't know the finer detail of such things.
His only real suggestion was to use a tile on baton cladding which was popular in the area to which I responded that it would not really be in keeping with an art deco style house.

Anyway, It sounds like they don't have much knowledge or interest because it's not part of their workload - the 'experts' are the self regulated installers and infrastructure.

I will chase this up again when the CWI is removed because I do want the building control searches from a potential house buyer to be an issue many years down the line.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The controversy over Cavity Wall Insulation 'topups'

-
Image
In this article I talk about the practice and problems of topping up insulation when voids are discovered, why it is being done and the potential violations of building regulations. I can only put forwards what I have understood from public documents and personal correspondence  So I welcome corrections or clarifications from the industry on this important issue for home owners and will happily update this post to reflect any inaccurate statements. We know that 100s of topups are done every year.   From what I can gather : If the BBA have not approved these topups then the relevant local authority building control should have been notified prior to topping up as an 'off licence' use of the product.  It is not clear that the correct procedures are being followed in all cases. Background :Voids are common A void is simply an area cavity between the walls which is missing insulation.  If a void is large enough then the insulation will not be compliant with the meter square
Read more

Lintels, weep holes and render

-
Image
I found the notion of lintels in cavity trays difficult to visualise. The reason I'm looking into lintels is that there is a damp patch that runs along the lintel over the front door. Brick houses built today will have cavity trays and weep holes inserted into the design. You will spot weep holes these as either gaps in the mortar or where the mortar is replaced with a perforated plastic insert as below. CIGA state that no water should enter the cavity is properly maintained building. If that is so then why does building control mandate a cavity tray. Typical modern cavity tray with weep holes sitting on a steel lintel. The purpose of a cavity tray is to ensure moisture that gets in the cavity when driven through the mortar joints or other means is directed back to the outside wall and out of the building. If you didn't have a cavity tray or some sort of damp proof course then moisture would collect on the flat lintel and then flow off the sides of the lintel or soa
Read more

Discrepancies between Internal and external DPC (damp proof course)

-
Image
In a cavity wall construction, one would expect that the damp proof membrane to be at the same level on both walls. It turns out this is not always the case and my house is a good example where the internal wall's DPC is more than a brick lower than the external wall DPC. I didn't even think to check this before reading the CIGA Technical note 14 . This clearly states that if the distance between DPC and ground level is within a brick (as was the case with my property at time of install) then 'numerous other factors' must be assessed before declaring the dwelling as being suitable for CWI. CIGA  Technical note 14 . One of the factors is the relative level of the inner and outer leaf DPC. This is exactly what I found in my property. Ive used a floorboard to show the position of the internal floor. The DPC is clearly a brick below the floorboard and less than brick above the block paving. External leaf DPC is 1 brick below the floor level.
Read more